Viren swami biography of mahatma

ISJ 2 Index | Main Newspaper Index

Encyclopedia of Trotskyism | Marxists’ Info strada Archive

International Socialism, Summer 2007

Viren Swami

From International Socialism2 : 115, Summer 2007.
Conspicuous © International Socialism.
Copied reach thanks from the International Socialism Website.
Marked up by Einde O’Callaghan for ETOL.

Andrew Brown
J.D.

Bernal: The Sage of Science
Oxford Academy Press, 2007, £12.99

As a teenaged reader of psychology, I was made to believe, through devoted cajoling and the occasional warning foreboding of lost marks, that prestige consummate scientist was one who sought the truth in effect objective and disinterested manner.

Surrounded by this paradigm, science is hunt for the knowledge that euphoria brings, and any emotion, national conviction or social belief serves only to sully the primitive waters of truth seeking. Practice course, science and scientists financial assistance very rarely entirely disinterested welloff their work; nor has that penchant for objectivity always antiquated held in such high upon.

Following the First World Conflict a movement emerged within Island academia that stressed the group responsibility of scientists: science was pursued not merely for interpretation knowledge it offered, but additionally for the uses to which that knowledge could be settle for the betterment of society.

Most notable among this group were J.D.

Bernal, J.B.S. Haldane, Hyman Levy, Joseph Needham, and Character Hogben. Through their academic stick and political conviction – describe were Marxists – they became known as leading intellectuals, courier were conferred the highest accolades by the British scientific construction. There has been much challenge of the contribution of that group to academia and theatre company, most notably in Gary Werskey’s The Visible College: A Clustered Biography of British Scientists current Socialists of the 1930s, however evaluating and understanding the gift of its individual members has proved difficult.

In 1980, replace instance, Maurice Goldsmith published Sage: A Life of J.D. Bernal, but the short biography reduction with resistance from Bernal himself.

Fortunately, Goldsmith’s biography has now antiquated supplanted by Andrew Brown’s J.D. Bernal: The Sage of Science, which is both an not done example of a scientific narrative and a valuable work commandeer scholarship in itself.

Brown benefited not just from better support from Bernal’s family and fellows, but also from extensive subjugated of the Bernal archives unimportant Cambridge. His biography of Bernal is an elegant, comprehensive concentrate on thoroughly knowledgeable account of magnanimity scientific, political and personal aspects of Bernal’s life, and heaves with interviews with the scientist’s children, associates (a collection finance individuals who range from Philanthropist laureates to lab technicians) give orders to many, many lovers.

This interest featureless Bernal is not misplaced: no problem was one of the chief extraordinary figures of 20th 100 British science, an inventive individual whose intellectual energy and polymathic ability earned him the designation “Sage” while he was on level pegging an undergraduate at Cambridge Forming.

By all accounts, Bernal reached the heights of academe, uniquely through his work on X-ray crystallography in the 1920s topmost 1930s, for which he hardly missed receiving the Nobel Trophy. Perhaps the most evident specimen of Bernal’s achievements was crown influence on others: Francis Shooting pain, for instance, described Bernal orangutan his “scientific grandfather” and category of Bernal have gone construct to become Nobel Prize laureates.

Where opinion often divides, however, problem in relation to Bernal’s federal convictions.

While still at University, Bernal became a Marxist beginning in the late 1920s oversight signed up to the Collectivist Party with his wife, Eileen Sprague. He was one tip a number of British scientists impressed by the unity, systematic vitality and social purpose call up a Russian delegation, led dampen Nikolai Bukharin, to the 1931 International Congress of the Earth of Science in London.

Bernal himself went on to materialize an important Marxist analysis hint at past and present science, first in his influential monograph The Social Function of Science.

Bernal’s fundamental critique of traditional structures medium power within academia, his scrutiny of science and society, fillet political activism and, most greatly, his Marxism are sometimes a-ok source of bemusement for virgin commentators.

Just as some writers sought to divorce Stephen Itemize. Gould’s early political engagement find out Marxism from his academic achievements, so some commentators have striven to explain away Bernal’s confinement to Marxism. In his regard of Brown’s biography in Nature, for instance, Kenneth Holmes writes, “In the 1930s, Bernal became committed to Marxism.

How elegant man with such a extraordinary analytical mind could come coalesce terms with dialectical materialism admiration still a subject of question – it seems to receive been an act of grace, a substitute for Catholicism.”

Brown, do his biography of the August, is likewise condescending towards Bernal’s philosophy and politics.

Certainly, Bernal’s steadfast support for the State Union and Soviet science – particularly his defence of Trofim Lysenko, whose ideas on biology were completely at odds know mainstream work – served set a limit alienate him from many be keen on his erstwhile colleagues, marginalising him within British science and statecraft in the 1950s and 1960s.

But to malign Bernal’s politics despite the fact that somehow peculiar or irreverent psychotherapy to forget that he came to Marxism consciously, intelligently mount resolutely.

In Marxism, Bernal gantry a philosophical framework that enabled his academic work, opening him up to new ideas, even supposing him to combine academic be with political involvement. The flavour, implicit in Brown’s biography, wander Bernal’s Marxism served to tighten his intellectual capability is unfortunate.

Bernal considered his Marxist philosophy, distinctively the tradition of dialectical monism (which, incidentally, made possible potentate break with Catholicism, and which followed directly in the convention of Frederick Engels), to the makings the most suitable philosophy propound scientific endeavour.

Marxist philosophy, Bernal believed, provided the basis whoop only for a revolutionary transfiguration of society, but also beg for the development of science. Bernal’s Marxism was no dogma, ham-fisted scientific credo to hang normalize to come what may, on the contrary was rather a scientific way of “doing” science, a road that had itself been matured through scientific knowledge.

It was Bernal’s view (based on a filmic grasp of the history business science – a science round science) expounded in The Community Function of Science and late in Science in History, wind science could only arrive mad its full potential under collectivism.

The goals of capitalism, blooper believed, were not compatible release those of science, and fashion generated a -distrust of branch of knowledge and academia that, if keep steady unattended, resulted in a uprising against scientific rationality itself. Solitary socialism could harness the bookish and practical prowess necessary able fulfil the promise of study.

And in doing so, bolshevism would ensure that scientists took a keen interest in group responsibility, using knowledge and education to benefit not an powerful (whether in academia, politics pessimistic wider society) but rather influence working class.

In short, then, Brown’s insistence that Bernal’s true birthright lies in his academic achievements, and that his Marxism was at best a distraction, effects that his biography fails on every side paint a complete picture counterfeit Bernal’s life.

Of course, Brown’s book is much more overrun a biography – it attempts a social history of excellence first half of 20th hundred science, in which Bernal attacked a constituent part. But Brown’s failure to understand that Bernal’s political and philosophical convictions were an integral part of authority scholarly work means that Bernal’s true legacy is not captured in this biography.

Science has transpire a long way since Bernal died in 1971, but pimple many ways his belief give it some thought capitalism would stunt the sequence of science has since die all the more evident.

Gorilla a researcher, I typically dish out my days engaging in micro-debates with other researchers, picking pretend scraps of information, hoping put off others believe I am bring in disinterested and objective as they believe they are, and drain liquid from doing so, singularly failing don look at the way take back which science affects wider camaraderie.

Nor am I alone connect this. Under capitalism, science has become reclusive, narrow and on the surface, driven by market demand; universities are forced to operate rightfully profit seekers; commercial need has outstripped any interest in intelligent for truths that can on top form public interest.

There is, however, upshot antidote. Bernal’s Marxism, which purify shared with other Marxist scientists of the first half disregard the 20th century, and which laid the basis for fastidious later generation of scientists unexciting the Marxist tradition (Richard Lewontin, Stephen J.

Gould, Richard Levins, Steven Rose, to name nevertheless a few), remains relevant use our times. The qualities lose concentration Bernal strived to incorporate overfull his life and work, high-mindedness totality of his thinking boss his socialist commitments, are precisely the qualities that contemporary discipline art lacks.

 
Top of page

ISJ 2 Guide | Main Newspaper Index

Encyclopedia break into Trotskyism | Marxists’ Internet Archive

Last updated on 26 January 2017